jamesingham
05-29 10:16 AM
As far as I know, nothing that is being considered in the Senate is going to relieve the Green Card backlog.
They have plans to eliminate the backlog in 5 to 8 years not immediately. So if one chooses not to re-apply under the new point based system, waiting time doesnt change much for him. (It may be become worse because they are cutting down immigrant visas in EB category from 130k to 90k)
But if one decides to re-apply under the new point based system, things may become faster.
I am hoping that under the new system, they will give some priority to people who already waited for a significant amount of time under the old system.
This is just my analysis based on the articles I read on the internet and the bill text itself.
They have plans to eliminate the backlog in 5 to 8 years not immediately. So if one chooses not to re-apply under the new point based system, waiting time doesnt change much for him. (It may be become worse because they are cutting down immigrant visas in EB category from 130k to 90k)
But if one decides to re-apply under the new point based system, things may become faster.
I am hoping that under the new system, they will give some priority to people who already waited for a significant amount of time under the old system.
This is just my analysis based on the articles I read on the internet and the bill text itself.
wallpaper hot emma stone zombieland
jliechty
June 5th, 2005, 07:06 PM
Yes, I like the "floating in air" effect.
I third that. :)
I third that. :)
VivekAhuja
06-16 07:15 PM
Possible if Master's is in same field.
2011 quot;It#39;s kind of nice,quot; Emma told
subba
07-08 12:36 PM
Was in the middle of job search before this rollercoaster ride happenned.
Not sure what approach to take now.
Not sure what approach to take now.
more...
smuggymba
12-18 08:31 AM
Cap on skilled immigration unlawful: UK court - World News - IBNLive (http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cap-on-skilled-immigration-unlawful-uk-court/137822-2.html?from=tn)
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
cagedcactus
05-01 12:01 PM
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070501/NEWS01/70501019
check it out.......
check it out.......
more...
insbaby
08-11 04:55 PM
Congratulations!!.
The H4 process should be an easy one and first time, should be no problems. Not sure whether they will do Back ground check on a H4, till end of 2007 all of my friends got it pretty quick, in about 3 to 4 days.
They implemented PIMS after Nov 2007. So your H1 may get slight delay and not sure about new H4 rules.
The H4 process should be an easy one and first time, should be no problems. Not sure whether they will do Back ground check on a H4, till end of 2007 all of my friends got it pretty quick, in about 3 to 4 days.
They implemented PIMS after Nov 2007. So your H1 may get slight delay and not sure about new H4 rules.
2010 2011 Emma Stone (Zombieland) emma stone bangs zombieland.
WillIBLucky
01-10 02:23 PM
For a while I was glad no one is talking about this. But I guess its hard not to talk about it as well. :D
There is no point in guessing the visa bulletin......
Guys:
Any news when this would be out and what to expect..??
Good Luck..
There is no point in guessing the visa bulletin......
Guys:
Any news when this would be out and what to expect..??
Good Luck..
more...
DrAnnSocolofskyMD
07-25 07:26 PM
I am an American physician and I am currently working on building an Internet business. What kinds of questions do you have? I might be able to help. In addition to my medical practice, which includes acting as a Civil Surgeon, I am an Independent Business Advisor for Bill Glazier and Dan Kennedy. You might not know who they are but they offer training in creating information products to sell on the Internet and they also help business owners learn how to increase their income. And it has NOTHING to do with Amway.
hair tattoo hair emma stone
diptam
07-01 03:59 PM
'Department of Homeland Security'
But if you have put USCIS - dont pull your hairs. You are still okay.
This should be "Department of Homeland Security" per Attorney.
But if you have put USCIS - dont pull your hairs. You are still okay.
This should be "Department of Homeland Security" per Attorney.
more...
newbie2020
06-17 08:56 PM
It all depends when someone applies for the labor, if you had BS+ 5 yrs exp and then did MS +4 yrs if you apply your labor now you can claim MS+9 again the experience at the current employer is not counted.....
hot Emma Stone (zombieland,
ChalapathiChitturi
07-22 02:51 PM
Thank You little_willy and lifesucksinUS.
I also have the same question as jambapamba.
I also have the same question as jambapamba.
more...
house Aug 11, 10:57 AM emma stone
sunnymit
09-08 04:18 PM
My wife is scheduled to appear for fingerprinting at 1 om a future scheduled date. However I learned from someone that she can go for the fingerprinting even earlier in the day and she will be fine. Is this true? Has anyone experienced this?
tattoo Emma+stone+zombieland+
GC_hope_2006
08-08 04:55 PM
Please find below my case details:
i.Started on L1A in Dec 2001
ii.Applied for a new H1 in June 2005 with start date as Oct 1,2005(New H1 application) : Came to US on H1 in Mar 2006 with "I 94 and Petition End Date(PED)" as Dec 2007.
iii.Since Dec 2001 till Mar 2006, have been in India for totalling 10 months (2.5 months in 2003, 1.5 months 2004, 6 months during 2005-2006).
With the assumption that I can recapture the time spent outside US (10 months), the six year clock ends in Oct 2008. If so, to get 7th year extension
would it work as long as the Labour is filed before Oct 2007.
Am I correct in this assessment or does the 6 year clock indeed ends in "Dec 2007" (as in my I94/PED) and I should have the Labour filed before Dec 2006.
Any thoughts? Appreciate your comments.
Thanks very much in advance.
i.Started on L1A in Dec 2001
ii.Applied for a new H1 in June 2005 with start date as Oct 1,2005(New H1 application) : Came to US on H1 in Mar 2006 with "I 94 and Petition End Date(PED)" as Dec 2007.
iii.Since Dec 2001 till Mar 2006, have been in India for totalling 10 months (2.5 months in 2003, 1.5 months 2004, 6 months during 2005-2006).
With the assumption that I can recapture the time spent outside US (10 months), the six year clock ends in Oct 2008. If so, to get 7th year extension
would it work as long as the Labour is filed before Oct 2007.
Am I correct in this assessment or does the 6 year clock indeed ends in "Dec 2007" (as in my I94/PED) and I should have the Labour filed before Dec 2006.
Any thoughts? Appreciate your comments.
Thanks very much in advance.
more...
pictures emma stone debuts new blonde 2
linklinklink
06-25 02:53 PM
For those who have same problem.
I just come back from local USCIS office. They do not make changes on I-94 any more ( I did show the memo whick is outdated according to the office). Now it's direct mail service. The supervisor of the office confirmed that I do not need file I-102 form if I file I-485 to adjust status, but I do need copies of all my I-94s including the error one. Good luck to anyone.
I just come back from local USCIS office. They do not make changes on I-94 any more ( I did show the memo whick is outdated according to the office). Now it's direct mail service. The supervisor of the office confirmed that I do not need file I-102 form if I file I-485 to adjust status, but I do need copies of all my I-94s including the error one. Good luck to anyone.
dresses pictures girlfriend Emma Stone
gcharry
11-11 07:46 PM
Hi, Last August 07, I have applied for 140 & 485 and have a priority date of Feb 2005. I got married in July 08. Now, I can't apply 485 for my spouse as dates are not current. My 140 got approved. I am just worried that My 485 might get approved before I could apply 485 for my spouse. And no one knows when 485 date will be current again. Any ideas? Any one is in my situation?
Thanks.
Thanks.
more...
makeup hair emma stone zombieland
dassumi
03-02 04:54 PM
I will be remoting in from a different state. My employer would not file a new labor condition application which is required.
That makes sense. From your company's perspective (book keeping), this is like a new hire right? I don't see an issue at all with using your EAD (invoking AC21). One thing you may want to check is if being on contract vs. full time has any detrimental effect on the G.C. application. I personally dont think that there will be, as many of us are on contract with an employer
I would consult an attorney, let me know if you need one and I can get you in touch with mine.
That makes sense. From your company's perspective (book keeping), this is like a new hire right? I don't see an issue at all with using your EAD (invoking AC21). One thing you may want to check is if being on contract vs. full time has any detrimental effect on the G.C. application. I personally dont think that there will be, as many of us are on contract with an employer
I would consult an attorney, let me know if you need one and I can get you in touch with mine.
girlfriend images emma stone zombieland
kumarc123
08-26 10:11 AM
Hi All,
I am here in US on a H1B and my wife is on a H4. She recently got admission to a graduate school and has to start next week. I am worried that if I get her COS for the next semester (this is a 1 year program), then woud she be eligible to get her OPT at the end of the program? She would have been on a F1 for less than a year, but would have completed the Master's program.
I tried to get more information, but what I saw was that the OPT eligiblility requirement is atleast 1 full academic year on F1. Is this correct?
Help is greatly appreciated.
I am in the similar boat, don't worry your wife can always take etc classes as electives, and complete her one year. You can always pick etc classes, and make sure you remain in legal F1 visa status.
I am here in US on a H1B and my wife is on a H4. She recently got admission to a graduate school and has to start next week. I am worried that if I get her COS for the next semester (this is a 1 year program), then woud she be eligible to get her OPT at the end of the program? She would have been on a F1 for less than a year, but would have completed the Master's program.
I tried to get more information, but what I saw was that the OPT eligiblility requirement is atleast 1 full academic year on F1. Is this correct?
Help is greatly appreciated.
I am in the similar boat, don't worry your wife can always take etc classes as electives, and complete her one year. You can always pick etc classes, and make sure you remain in legal F1 visa status.
hairstyles emma stone zombieland haircut.
cygent
01-26 07:16 PM
Consider filing a complaint with AILF. But do so at your discretion, as relationships are also *VERY* important in these matters. Better not to burn to many bridges.
rodnyb
02-03 03:41 PM
Visa bulletin and their number control operational manual
Visa Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html)
DHS year book
DHS | Yearbook of Immigration Statistics (http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm)
485 pending number
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Green%20Card/Green%20Card%20Through%20a%20Job/i-485-pending-inventory.pdf
NVC demand
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/WaitingListItem.pdf
Precessing volume and trend
USCIS: National Processing Volumes and Trends (http://dashboard.uscis.gov/index.cfm?formtype=7&office=5&charttype=1)
Monthly cutoff memo
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf
I am missing a 2009 EB number used by country, I saw it some where but couldn't find it
Visa Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html)
DHS year book
DHS | Yearbook of Immigration Statistics (http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/yearbook.shtm)
485 pending number
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Green%20Card/Green%20Card%20Through%20a%20Job/i-485-pending-inventory.pdf
NVC demand
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/WaitingListItem.pdf
Precessing volume and trend
USCIS: National Processing Volumes and Trends (http://dashboard.uscis.gov/index.cfm?formtype=7&office=5&charttype=1)
Monthly cutoff memo
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf
I am missing a 2009 EB number used by country, I saw it some where but couldn't find it
ajm
04-13 09:08 PM
Friends,
I am in the 8th year of H1b and I have been juggling this idea of changing my job because of a sucking work environment. I have Eb3 labor(it was applied in eb3 even though my job required and i had the eb2 experience) approved and 140 approved so can I get 3 year extension by changing my job or do you suggest to first get 3 year extension and then change, in which case will I still get 3 year extension is the question.
Once you find a job, ask the new employer to apply for a 3 year extension based on the approved I-140 (the courtesy copy should be enough). You can retain the old priority date when you re-start the GC process with the new company (if the current employer maintains the LC/I-140: not sure what happens if either is revoked).
I am in the 8th year of H1b and I have been juggling this idea of changing my job because of a sucking work environment. I have Eb3 labor(it was applied in eb3 even though my job required and i had the eb2 experience) approved and 140 approved so can I get 3 year extension by changing my job or do you suggest to first get 3 year extension and then change, in which case will I still get 3 year extension is the question.
Once you find a job, ask the new employer to apply for a 3 year extension based on the approved I-140 (the courtesy copy should be enough). You can retain the old priority date when you re-start the GC process with the new company (if the current employer maintains the LC/I-140: not sure what happens if either is revoked).
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu