ryanw
Sep 12, 11:43 AM
i don't think it will be live...
their servers will not be able to handle the load..
They used to do all the apple events live broadcast. The wwdc keynotes and the itunes ones.
their servers will not be able to handle the load..
They used to do all the apple events live broadcast. The wwdc keynotes and the itunes ones.
Habakuk
Sep 29, 05:44 PM
Restart your mac.
Thx for the hint, that did the trick. App works fine now. Great app btw.
At MBP restart the EyeTV 3.2 asked for WiFi permission. The update to 3.2 (btw failed the first time) did not require a restart of the machine.
Thx for the hint, that did the trick. App works fine now. Great app btw.
At MBP restart the EyeTV 3.2 asked for WiFi permission. The update to 3.2 (btw failed the first time) did not require a restart of the machine.
Chundles
Nov 9, 08:44 PM
I would like to be able to put money on Leopard being released publicly before Vista.
I'm guessing Apple pushes to do just that.
Very much doubt it, we were seeing release candidate builds of 10.4 long before it came out. The supposed Gold Master build was out about a month before Tiger was released.
I don't think we'll see Leopard until early autumn, this summer's big OS release will be Vista - Leopard would get obliterated in press coverage by Vista if they released at the same time. Apple want as much press as possible for Leopard and they need as much time as they can to get it ready to the point where it's not going to get bad release coverage for bugs etc.
So:
Summer = Vista (followed 3 months later by SP1)
Early Autumn = Leopard (followed 3 weeks later by 10.5.1)
I'm guessing Apple pushes to do just that.
Very much doubt it, we were seeing release candidate builds of 10.4 long before it came out. The supposed Gold Master build was out about a month before Tiger was released.
I don't think we'll see Leopard until early autumn, this summer's big OS release will be Vista - Leopard would get obliterated in press coverage by Vista if they released at the same time. Apple want as much press as possible for Leopard and they need as much time as they can to get it ready to the point where it's not going to get bad release coverage for bugs etc.
So:
Summer = Vista (followed 3 months later by SP1)
Early Autumn = Leopard (followed 3 weeks later by 10.5.1)
Mad Mac Maniac
Apr 12, 09:21 AM
:rolleyes:
I meant that I totally agree with you.
haha, oh. I'm not familiar with a . being agreement. Usually I just see a +1, etc. But whatever works for ya!
I meant that I totally agree with you.
haha, oh. I'm not familiar with a . being agreement. Usually I just see a +1, etc. But whatever works for ya!
am476
Dec 7, 01:12 PM
Interesting app. Unfortunately the place where my phone drops the most also has a funky gps issue. My iPhone usually says I'm located anywhere from 10 to 20 miles away (and yes, it has the pin point orb thing and not the you're in this general area circle). So I can report the problem but AT&T will get some random spot in the city and not the actual position.
This isn't a GPS issue. It's actually something wrong with the AT&T network. The iPhone locates you with different information sources with GPS being only one of them. The information that the network cell tower provides is how the iPhones seems to begin its search.
Where I live (Essex county New Jersey), the iPhone tells me that I'm in near the Pennsylvania/NJ border - about 40-50 miles away - when I try to get my current location. When I go to Airplane mode and turn on WiFi, I get the correct location. So something is up with either the nearest tower or something is wrong with our SIM cards. You can make the report and see if others in your area have the same issue.
Otherwise, if things aren't resolved, I'd get a new SIM card activated. This was Apple's advice (confirmed by the WiFi/Airplane mode experiment).
This isn't a GPS issue. It's actually something wrong with the AT&T network. The iPhone locates you with different information sources with GPS being only one of them. The information that the network cell tower provides is how the iPhones seems to begin its search.
Where I live (Essex county New Jersey), the iPhone tells me that I'm in near the Pennsylvania/NJ border - about 40-50 miles away - when I try to get my current location. When I go to Airplane mode and turn on WiFi, I get the correct location. So something is up with either the nearest tower or something is wrong with our SIM cards. You can make the report and see if others in your area have the same issue.
Otherwise, if things aren't resolved, I'd get a new SIM card activated. This was Apple's advice (confirmed by the WiFi/Airplane mode experiment).
toolbox
Mar 4, 07:16 PM
oh dear god. please dont!
Quiet you ! LoL
Quiet you ! LoL
TheSlush
Dec 7, 01:41 PM
I rarely have anything good to say about AT&T, but this app sounds like a potentially good use of crowdsourcing. The question, of course, is: will this incoming feedback actually be reviewed and acted upon by AT&T, or is this effort primarily to create the "illusion of responsiveness" and make us all just feel better.
Benjy91
Apr 4, 09:54 PM
Well its always been a phone a year.
Now begin the rumors of what the phone has.
Now begin the rumors of what the phone has.
Chris Bangle
Sep 7, 04:09 PM
I just received info from a friend who works for apple in a 'new product marketing' capactiy. He started work this month.
Cell phone coming on the 12th.
Any more info..... can we believe you......:confused:
I just hope your right.:)
Cell phone coming on the 12th.
Any more info..... can we believe you......:confused:
I just hope your right.:)
gnasher729
Mar 24, 12:16 PM
If some of the components come from Japan, is Apple scanning the finished units for radiation? I'm not saying but I'm just saying...
Check out www.theregister.com for some articles that provide a bit of sanity to that issue. If you are afraid of radiation then you should insist that your iPad is transported by ship and not by aeroplane, because it gets much more exposure to radiation while in the air.
Check out www.theregister.com for some articles that provide a bit of sanity to that issue. If you are afraid of radiation then you should insist that your iPad is transported by ship and not by aeroplane, because it gets much more exposure to radiation while in the air.
chrisfromalbany
Apr 19, 12:55 PM
That's not how steam works. When you purchase something through steam, you can download and install it as many times as you want. If your computer crashes, all you have to do is reinstall steam log into your account and redownload it. This is one of the reasons why steam is so popular.
as far as the price. $50 for games is standard, especially for pc ( and I guess now mac ). It costs millions of dollars to make and promote a game. Most games for consoles are $60 and there PC counterpart are $50 because both microsoft and sony take $10 off each sale. If you are concerned with the length of the game, go read a few reviews and they will all tell you the game is much much longer then the original, plus it includes a co-op mode with different levels. $50 seems pretty good to me.
Also, it's supply/demand. Millions of people are going to go out and spend $50 on the game, so why not sell it at $50? The nice thing about steam is, if you can find it cheaper elsewhere, you can still install it on your PC/Mac and play it through steam. But a lot of people are willing to pay the $5 extra to get the convenience of not needing to ship or wait in a line to buy the game.
the streaming distribution of the game is much cheaper then phyiscal copy distribution. I just saying they can add an incentive to make people download it, and they make more MONEY. Which is a given they are making alot more per digital copy sold compared to phyiscal copy sold. There is sizible production cost with making phyiscal copy, distributing to retailers, and then giving cut to retailer who selling it. Especially as the title gets older and retailer take more on each sale.
Currently, I noted that it is cheaper to buy physical copy then it is to buy digital copy. That shouldn't be the case. And I believe eventually wont be the case in future for software. I not debating that there are costs involved with making these games, I am debating what the streaming model should look like. It show be cheaper.:o
as far as the price. $50 for games is standard, especially for pc ( and I guess now mac ). It costs millions of dollars to make and promote a game. Most games for consoles are $60 and there PC counterpart are $50 because both microsoft and sony take $10 off each sale. If you are concerned with the length of the game, go read a few reviews and they will all tell you the game is much much longer then the original, plus it includes a co-op mode with different levels. $50 seems pretty good to me.
Also, it's supply/demand. Millions of people are going to go out and spend $50 on the game, so why not sell it at $50? The nice thing about steam is, if you can find it cheaper elsewhere, you can still install it on your PC/Mac and play it through steam. But a lot of people are willing to pay the $5 extra to get the convenience of not needing to ship or wait in a line to buy the game.
the streaming distribution of the game is much cheaper then phyiscal copy distribution. I just saying they can add an incentive to make people download it, and they make more MONEY. Which is a given they are making alot more per digital copy sold compared to phyiscal copy sold. There is sizible production cost with making phyiscal copy, distributing to retailers, and then giving cut to retailer who selling it. Especially as the title gets older and retailer take more on each sale.
Currently, I noted that it is cheaper to buy physical copy then it is to buy digital copy. That shouldn't be the case. And I believe eventually wont be the case in future for software. I not debating that there are costs involved with making these games, I am debating what the streaming model should look like. It show be cheaper.:o
Plutonius
Mar 29, 03:34 PM
I've always thought all along that Apple was going to have to pay Nokia something or settle this simply because other cell phone manufacturers using similar technology have already settled with Nokia.
The question now is why has Apple been so stubborn? Do they know something we don't or are they risking the farm on this one?
With the Nokia/Microsoft deal in place, is it possible Nokia had no intention of ever settling with Apple like they did with other cell phone manufacturers? Hmm, makes me wonder.
And of course, I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop which will be Apple filing another lawsuit against Nokia after losing the first round of their countersuit.
And anyone know what's going on with the Apple lawsuit against HTC? That could conceivably have broad implications on the entire Android OS itself and Google.
Now my final question would be, is it possible Apple could file suit against BOTH Microsoft and Nokia when the Windows Phone 7 Nokia phones come out? I mean, Steve Jobs said it himself that Apple had patented the iPhone to the hilt and intended to protect all those patents.
I somehow think this is all going to end up in a wash in the end and I just realized I've given myself a patented headache typing all this.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/03/03/technology/bits-suepatent2/bits-suepatent2-blogSpan.jpg
As I remember when this first came out, Nokia wanted both money and access to Apple's patent portfolio. Apple did not want to give Nokia access to Apple's patent portfolio and wanted to pay Nokia less money (Note - Nokia wanted to get a percentage of each phone sold (lot of money for a smart phone) while Apple wanted to give a lesser fixed amount).
The question now is why has Apple been so stubborn? Do they know something we don't or are they risking the farm on this one?
With the Nokia/Microsoft deal in place, is it possible Nokia had no intention of ever settling with Apple like they did with other cell phone manufacturers? Hmm, makes me wonder.
And of course, I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop which will be Apple filing another lawsuit against Nokia after losing the first round of their countersuit.
And anyone know what's going on with the Apple lawsuit against HTC? That could conceivably have broad implications on the entire Android OS itself and Google.
Now my final question would be, is it possible Apple could file suit against BOTH Microsoft and Nokia when the Windows Phone 7 Nokia phones come out? I mean, Steve Jobs said it himself that Apple had patented the iPhone to the hilt and intended to protect all those patents.
I somehow think this is all going to end up in a wash in the end and I just realized I've given myself a patented headache typing all this.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/03/03/technology/bits-suepatent2/bits-suepatent2-blogSpan.jpg
As I remember when this first came out, Nokia wanted both money and access to Apple's patent portfolio. Apple did not want to give Nokia access to Apple's patent portfolio and wanted to pay Nokia less money (Note - Nokia wanted to get a percentage of each phone sold (lot of money for a smart phone) while Apple wanted to give a lesser fixed amount).
SactoGuy18
May 1, 08:10 AM
However, the USA has one gigantic advantage that other countries don't have: an unprecedented ground transportation infrastructure to move goods around on both rail and paved roads.
This is a problem that in many ways still plague India and China--they don't have enough ground transportation infrastructure to handle large-scale economic growth, especially factories well inland unless they're right next to a major rail line. That's why in China, most of their big factories are either close to the coastline (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Xiamen, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Dalian) or at major crossroads of rail lines (Wuhan and Chengdu).
This is a problem that in many ways still plague India and China--they don't have enough ground transportation infrastructure to handle large-scale economic growth, especially factories well inland unless they're right next to a major rail line. That's why in China, most of their big factories are either close to the coastline (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Xiamen, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Dalian) or at major crossroads of rail lines (Wuhan and Chengdu).
AhmedFaisal
Jul 30, 03:43 PM
Now now... this sounds more like a personel preference then fact. I can say the same about whiskey or scotch. Don't like the taste. I can say I have grown more custom to the darker beers. And comparing Budweiser which is a lager to Chimay which is a belgium ale is trully disrespectiful to the beer gods! :D
Now now, calling Budweiser a beer is a stretch as it is and calling it a lager is an insult to any properly brewed lager out there. Like someone else in this thread stated before it's a cheap diluted ricewine with hops added for something pretending to be taste. As for Chimay, never had it but if it is in the same range of products as that .... stuff.... from Anheusser operates in, it probably isn't a belgium ale either.....
Cheers,
Ahmed
Now now, calling Budweiser a beer is a stretch as it is and calling it a lager is an insult to any properly brewed lager out there. Like someone else in this thread stated before it's a cheap diluted ricewine with hops added for something pretending to be taste. As for Chimay, never had it but if it is in the same range of products as that .... stuff.... from Anheusser operates in, it probably isn't a belgium ale either.....
Cheers,
Ahmed
maclaptop
Apr 17, 07:31 AM
why not make them in blue, green, red, yellow, brown, orange ...:p
I don't disagree, however I'm not sure Apple can learn to paint them in time :)
The kids don't have the patience for waiting.
We need to get into acceptance that there will be nothing new this year.
I don't disagree, however I'm not sure Apple can learn to paint them in time :)
The kids don't have the patience for waiting.
We need to get into acceptance that there will be nothing new this year.
wattage
Sep 12, 11:04 PM
It cracks me up how people start critiquing as soon as new products are released. The shuffle is our favorite thing announced today. When we got home tonight from San Fran we immediately checked the website and were very excited when we saw the new shuffle.
Perfect for fitness, so small and light. The bulkiest part will be the cords.
LOVE IT
Perfect for fitness, so small and light. The bulkiest part will be the cords.
LOVE IT
Segmac
Nov 17, 01:34 PM
Its got a ALPHA input that swaps for a Piano Key layout or an interactive touch input reading area.... Its also really cheep and sturdy so my 3 year old loves it.
http://www.leapfrog.com/media/lf_phase_2/product/15mflpbus1_v1_m56577569830496052.jpg
http://www.leapfrog.com/media/lf_phase_2/product/15mflpbus1_v1_m56577569830496052.jpg
edoates
Dec 2, 12:26 PM
Among the silliest concerns I've read about recently. You can be tracked by your shoes up to 60 feet away! (oh, and that is unobstructed feet). ******, from 60 feet, I think I can track you using my eyes. And the trackee can see the observer.
More manufactured paranoia.
Get a life, people.
More manufactured paranoia.
Get a life, people.
NT1440
May 1, 08:43 PM
That is how you see it ... "bend to your whims?" :rolleyes:
I however disagree with your opinion of the USA
Disagree all you want. Its a well known fact that the USA has been intervening all over the world and setting up friendly governments (to USA interests) for over five decades now.
I however disagree with your opinion of the USA
Disagree all you want. Its a well known fact that the USA has been intervening all over the world and setting up friendly governments (to USA interests) for over five decades now.
Socratic
Apr 28, 09:53 AM
They leaked the designs of a consumer product. Big who cares. It's not like they leaked nuclear submarine schematics. Personally I just think they should be dismissed. Anything more is heavy-handed. Can't believe how many people are advocating the death penalty here - it's an iPad - in the grand scheme of things you probably couldn't leak a design more trivial, or of less importance. Business shouldn't stand in the way of basic human rights.
maclaptop
Apr 11, 11:02 PM
If Apple really went green they'd make everything out of recycled plastic.
Correct.
Many would be surprised at the excellence of CFRP. It has ideal properties for use in laptops. Very light, strong, great looking and extremely durable. It can be finished in a natural matte or shiny. Paint is also an option which is every bit as durable due to the way it bonds with CFRP. When it comes right down to it, their are several choices for Apple.
Correct.
Many would be surprised at the excellence of CFRP. It has ideal properties for use in laptops. Very light, strong, great looking and extremely durable. It can be finished in a natural matte or shiny. Paint is also an option which is every bit as durable due to the way it bonds with CFRP. When it comes right down to it, their are several choices for Apple.
666sheep
Mar 22, 03:50 AM
@300D: your conclusion about X1900GT is based on PC world scores. In Mac OS performance is more driver and app dependent. Most of barefeats benches (gaming) are pointing that 7800 is faster than X1900GT, esp. in higher resolutions. 7800GTX 512MB (flashed) has 8 pipes more and twice RAM than X1900GT (24 vs 16).
http://www.barefeats.com/quad15.html
http://www.barefeats.com/mutant4.html
http://www.barefeats.com/quad15.html
http://www.barefeats.com/mutant4.html
itcheroni
Mar 27, 12:56 AM
At the schools I worked at, they had the soft caps but switched to a yellow or white helmet when they left school. But anyways, I can definitely see your point. When I was living there, I wondered why a healthy society would have so many smokers. Then I was told that the Japanese government owns half the tobacco industry. I remembered seeing an anti-smoking poster at the school I worked at and the three big reasons listed for not smoking didn't include any smoking related diseases. One of those reasons was that you will continue to want to smoke. Like that's really going to scare kids from smoking. It's practically the same as the slogan Frito-Lays used to use.
MISSLAY
Mar 29, 06:53 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8C148)
So I ordered mine on the 18th when it was a 4-5 week wait. But with the new timelines online, now anyone who orders one now will get theirs at the same time I am supposed to get mine. In fact, I tested it by ordering a second and sure enough, the ship date was only one day later then the one I ordered over a week ago. They never updated people existing ship dates before reducing new orders timelines. Doesn't show any preference to existing orders. Everything I have is Apple, but never run into this much poor translation of information to buy one of their products. Shame to be disillusioned about a brand I've always been a fan of until now. Hello i also order mines on 16th and no change in date for me this is sad i'm sick of this :mad:
So I ordered mine on the 18th when it was a 4-5 week wait. But with the new timelines online, now anyone who orders one now will get theirs at the same time I am supposed to get mine. In fact, I tested it by ordering a second and sure enough, the ship date was only one day later then the one I ordered over a week ago. They never updated people existing ship dates before reducing new orders timelines. Doesn't show any preference to existing orders. Everything I have is Apple, but never run into this much poor translation of information to buy one of their products. Shame to be disillusioned about a brand I've always been a fan of until now. Hello i also order mines on 16th and no change in date for me this is sad i'm sick of this :mad:
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu