thegoldenmackid
Nov 2, 04:03 PM
Whine whine whine. That clearly makes Apple fix the problem.
gameface
Mar 11, 11:44 AM
http://blurredsight.net/macrumors/bbeers-FOUTAIN.jpg
me likey.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5219/5515947913_35d4211a61_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5515947913/)
Like this a lot but why upload it with such low resolution? The sky falls apart and doesn't do it justice, IMHO.
And mine, just for fun.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5250/5381310045_dec8562a14_b.jpg
me likey.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5219/5515947913_35d4211a61_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeschmeee/5515947913/)
Like this a lot but why upload it with such low resolution? The sky falls apart and doesn't do it justice, IMHO.
And mine, just for fun.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5250/5381310045_dec8562a14_b.jpg
seattle
Mar 6, 11:21 PM
Awesome bird shot!
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5251/5505223098_fe16f69a41_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nwdad/5505223098/)
Water fountain (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nwdad/5505223098/) by Northwest dad (http://www.flickr.com/people/nwdad/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5251/5505223098_fe16f69a41_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nwdad/5505223098/)
Water fountain (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nwdad/5505223098/) by Northwest dad (http://www.flickr.com/people/nwdad/), on Flickr
drlunanerd
Nov 8, 08:55 AM
The 2.0 model also includes 4MB L2 cache instead of "just" 2MB L2 cache... remember the days when we used to measure L2 in increments of 256KB?
No, I can't actually. I'm typing this on a dual 533MHz G4 with 1MB L2 cache per processor - so 2MB total. Same as the Core Duo!
No, I can't actually. I'm typing this on a dual 533MHz G4 with 1MB L2 cache per processor - so 2MB total. Same as the Core Duo!
kugino
Sep 13, 01:21 AM
so when does amazon start selling these? with no education discount now, it makes sense to buy from amazon and free shipping/no tax.
maclaptop
May 4, 09:56 PM
man i wish 3D would just disappear...
You've said it best!
You've said it best!
nemaslov
Nov 27, 12:38 PM
Sometime I wonder if people actually use the products they talk about here.
The Rolling Stones have been in the iTunes music store for over a year. The currently have over 59 albums there and a new ep was released, I'm Free, just a couple of weeks ago.
Frank Zappa was on iTunes last summer and has since been removed. It was basically the albums that RYKODisc had re-mastered and released. There appears to be something going on with the Zappa Family Trust and RYKODisc over the rights.
Led Zepplin has never appeared on iTunes. However, Radio Head was on for a short time, but everyone who like Radio Head has already bought their one good album, The Bends.
Actually I think KID A is one of the best albums of all time and I am a first gen Beatles Fan. KID A is so original and not like much else out there...especially when it was first released. Kind of like when Revolver or Pepper was first released. Now so many other records have repeated that sound...like that British "cover" band.... OASIS!
The Rolling Stones have been in the iTunes music store for over a year. The currently have over 59 albums there and a new ep was released, I'm Free, just a couple of weeks ago.
Frank Zappa was on iTunes last summer and has since been removed. It was basically the albums that RYKODisc had re-mastered and released. There appears to be something going on with the Zappa Family Trust and RYKODisc over the rights.
Led Zepplin has never appeared on iTunes. However, Radio Head was on for a short time, but everyone who like Radio Head has already bought their one good album, The Bends.
Actually I think KID A is one of the best albums of all time and I am a first gen Beatles Fan. KID A is so original and not like much else out there...especially when it was first released. Kind of like when Revolver or Pepper was first released. Now so many other records have repeated that sound...like that British "cover" band.... OASIS!
KristenM
Dec 6, 10:38 PM
Isn't the user experience destroyed when we can't open a page or go to a link because we don't have Flash? I know what you're saying, but it's destroyed either way (too sloooow or nothing).
Exactly. While flash can be a PITA, it's really annoying to not be able to get to certain websites or other content because of the lack of flash. I'd like the option to turn it on only when I need it.
Exactly. While flash can be a PITA, it's really annoying to not be able to get to certain websites or other content because of the lack of flash. I'd like the option to turn it on only when I need it.
logandzwon
Apr 18, 07:03 AM
How very strange. I can not believe a store that sells telephones, MP3 players, Digital Cameras, video games, eReaders, GPS devices, TVs, dvd players, Apple iPods, laptops, and tablets would carry the Apple iPad.
Very surprising. I bet next your going to try to tell me the Apple Store is going to carry them.
Very surprising. I bet next your going to try to tell me the Apple Store is going to carry them.
Porchland
Jul 23, 01:22 PM
The current iPod is 4.1 x 2.4 inches. A mass market paperback -- which ain't big -- is roughy 7.1 x 4.3 inches, which is almost twice as large as an iPod. Most eBook devices are the size of a mass market paperback or larger. Portable DVD/DVR players are also typically larger than the iPod enclosure.
I am all for a wide format iPod where the screen is the thing, but I'm not sure I want to read a book (or watch movies) on it if it's going to be the same size as the current iPod enclosure.
I suspect it will be larger.
I am all for a wide format iPod where the screen is the thing, but I'm not sure I want to read a book (or watch movies) on it if it's going to be the same size as the current iPod enclosure.
I suspect it will be larger.
jegbook
Mar 25, 02:13 PM
419.9 mb on my 32GB 3GS
D.
419.9MB for me with 16GB 3Gs.
Different builds depending on device? Someone with multiple devices might be able to confirm that (if they have to download different builds, or possibly, if your iTunes manages multiple devices, that accounts for bigger downloads that accommodate multiple devices instead of just one).
D.
419.9MB for me with 16GB 3Gs.
Different builds depending on device? Someone with multiple devices might be able to confirm that (if they have to download different builds, or possibly, if your iTunes manages multiple devices, that accounts for bigger downloads that accommodate multiple devices instead of just one).
sunfast
Aug 24, 12:06 PM
Really? It's not on their website. :confused:
Warbrain
Aug 10, 06:50 PM
Is it me, or is the internals of the Mac Pro not as sexy as the internals of the PowerMac G5? It just doesn't feel the same.
Maybe it's just me.
Maybe it's just me.
daneoni
Sep 12, 04:10 PM
It's listed under "view"
Thanks
Thanks
FroMann
May 4, 11:18 PM
3D.
If it requires overpriced glasses, it ruins the pictures colors and looks awkward.
If it does not require overpriced glasses, you will get a headache and possibly vomit.
If it requires overpriced glasses, it ruins the pictures colors and looks awkward.
If it does not require overpriced glasses, you will get a headache and possibly vomit.
BRLawyer
Nov 8, 05:02 AM
Looks like someone at apple didn't think things all the way through correctly :p
Until 2 days ago the Swiss Store had MBs for 24 hour shipping...now it's slipped to 3 days..!
Bottomline: we're gonna have new MBs by next Tuesday the 14th...rest assured.
Until 2 days ago the Swiss Store had MBs for 24 hour shipping...now it's slipped to 3 days..!
Bottomline: we're gonna have new MBs by next Tuesday the 14th...rest assured.
Macmaniac
Apr 13, 03:54 PM
Having watched the video I cannot describe how excited I am about the new FCP. Coming from working on a monstrous project this will save so much time with the new interface. I am so excited about the magnetic timeline, I cannot wait to get my hands on it.
drlunanerd
Oct 27, 05:25 AM
Quite pleased that Apple takes notice and figures out solutions rather quickly.
cigarette smoking effects
docpsycho
Nov 8, 09:37 AM
Still no REAL GPU? Yawn
chuckles:)
Nov 23, 11:39 PM
I wonder if anyone payed 1.29 for revolution number nine.
calderone
Oct 26, 12:00 AM
I really hope you're being funny. You're a much more active member than I, but it's "fliquo.". Someone even has a sig stating something like, "the screensaver is fliquo, the answer is always fliquo."
Come on. You know jessica. knows. Why reply? In addition, you spelled it wrong. It's: Fliqlo.
Come on. You know jessica. knows. Why reply? In addition, you spelled it wrong. It's: Fliqlo.
iphone3gs16gb
Mar 18, 02:34 PM
Do you guys think it's time for an flash memory based iPod classic?
penningtonj
Oct 26, 02:15 PM
Are you satisfied with your Beats by Dre ?
I wasn't the original poster, but I've got a pair of these too and love them. The sound is phenomenal, however I have a big head (apparently) and they are a little tight.
I wasn't the original poster, but I've got a pair of these too and love them. The sound is phenomenal, however I have a big head (apparently) and they are a little tight.
63dot
Nov 24, 11:36 AM
The Beatles did the meat thing in 1966. ;)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/55/The_Beatles_-_Butcher_Cover.jpg/602px-The_Beatles_-_Butcher_Cover.jpg
The legendary butcher cover.
My brother in law bought the regular cover "Yesterday and Today" album for 25 cents at a garage sale, but underneath the placid regular cover was this gory one.
He then called our friend who owned a local used record shop. The record store owner urged him not to peel off the front image, even though my brother in law was curious as to what may be underneath that wholesome photo of the Beatles. Despite its estimated value at that time (early 90's) being $1,000 dollars, he steamed off the regular cover to reveal the butcher cover and thus dropped the value of the LP by half the amount. The record shop owner was distraught!
The most sought after cover is the censored "safe" one with this gore hiding underneath it. Today a cover like this, with all the blood and gore, would not upset anyone.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/55/The_Beatles_-_Butcher_Cover.jpg/602px-The_Beatles_-_Butcher_Cover.jpg
The legendary butcher cover.
My brother in law bought the regular cover "Yesterday and Today" album for 25 cents at a garage sale, but underneath the placid regular cover was this gory one.
He then called our friend who owned a local used record shop. The record store owner urged him not to peel off the front image, even though my brother in law was curious as to what may be underneath that wholesome photo of the Beatles. Despite its estimated value at that time (early 90's) being $1,000 dollars, he steamed off the regular cover to reveal the butcher cover and thus dropped the value of the LP by half the amount. The record shop owner was distraught!
The most sought after cover is the censored "safe" one with this gore hiding underneath it. Today a cover like this, with all the blood and gore, would not upset anyone.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu